Costs Before and After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant and Preceding Heart Transplant: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of heart transplant candidates require bridging with left ventricular assist devices (VAD). This study describes hospital activity and cost 1 year preceding and 1 year following VAD implant (pre-VAD) and for the year before transplant (pre-HTX). The sample comprises an Australian cohort and is the first study to investigate costs using both institutional and linked administrative data. METHODS: Institutional activity was established for 77 consecutive patients actively listed for transplant between 2009 and 2012. Costs were sourced from the institution or Australian refined diagnosis groups (arDRGs) and the National Efficient Price for admissions to other public and private institutions. Data from 25/77 VAD recipients were analysed and compared with data from 52/77 pre-transplant patients. Total and per day at risk costs were assessed, as well as totals per resource. RESULTS: Fifty per cent (50%) of the hospital costs in the pre-VAD year occurred during admission of VAD implant. Sixty-four per cent (64%) of costs in the pre-HTX and 38% in the pre-VAD period occurred outside the implanting centre. Costs in the year prior to VAD, $97,565 (IQR $86,907-$153,916), were significantly higher than costs accrued in the year prior to transplant, $40,250 ($13,493-$81,260), p < 0.0001. Once discharged, costs per day at risk for post-VAD patients approximated those from the pre-admission period, p = 0.16 and in the more clinically stable pre-HTX cohort, p = 0.08. CONCLUSION: Compared with the year prior, VAD implant stabilised hospital cost in patients discharged home. A high proportion of the hospital costs in the pre-implant year occur outside the implanting centre and should be considered in economic models assessing the impact of VAD implant.

Utilizing the index for mortality prediction after cardiac transplantation risk score to predict hospital resource consumption.

OBJECTIVE: The index for mortality prediction after cardiac transplantation (IMPACT) risk score incorporates 12 preoperative recipient-specific variables, and has been validated as an accurate predictor of short- and long-term mortality after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHTx). We believe it can also be used to predict hospital costs, and we hypothesize that higher preoperative IMPACT risk scores are associated with increased hospital resource consumption. METHODS: All OHTx patients ≥18 years of age at our institution were reviewed from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2014. Total index hospitalization costs post-transplant were extracted and presented in 2014 consumer price index inflation-adjusted US dollars. Patients were stratified into quartiles (Q) according to IMPACT risk scores. Logarithmic transformation normalized cost data, and linear regression assessed for correlation. A comparison of cost between Q of IMPACT risk score was performed using rank-sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-six (n = 356) OHTx were performed during the study period. The median IMPACT score for the cohort was five (interquartile range [IQR] 3-6). Eight (2.2%) patients died within 30-days and 1-year Kaplan-Meier survival was 88.3%. The median length of stay (LOS) was 16 (IQR 14-24) days. The median hospital cost for index admission was $222 200 (IQR:$169 200-$313 700). Median LOS was longer in Q4 vs Q1 (18 days vs 15 days, P = .01) and index hospital costs in Q4 were significantly higher compared to Q1 patients ($280 400 vs $205 000, P < .01). There was a significant positive correlation between IMPACT risk score and cost (regression coefficient .04, P < .01). CONCLUSION: This is the first study in adult cardiac transplantation to identify a positive correlation between hospital cost and recipient risk using the IMPACT risk score. Cost and resource consumption for the index admission after OHTx were significantly higher in the highest IMPACT risk Q compared with patients in the lowest Q.

Inhaled Pulmonary Vasodilators and Thoracic Organ Transplantation: Does Evidence Support Its Use and Cost Benefit?

In heart transplantation, pulmonary hypertension and increased pulmonary vascular resistance followed by donor right ventricular dysfunction remain a major cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality. In lung transplantation, primary graft dysfunction remains a major obstacle because it can cause bronchiolitis obliterans and mortality. Pulmonary vasodilators have been used as an adjunct therapy for heart or lung transplantation, mainly to treat pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular failure, and associated refractory hypoxemia. Among pulmonary vasodilators, inhaled nitric oxide is unique in that it is selective in pulmonary circulation and causes fewer systemic complications such as hypotension, flushing, or coagulopathy. Nitric oxide is expected to prevent or attenuate primary graft dysfunction by decreasing ischemia-reperfusion injury in lung transplantation. However, when considering the long-term benefit of these medications, little evidence supports their use in heart or lung transplantation. Current guidelines endorse inhaled vasodilators for managing immediate postoperative right ventricular failure in lung or heart transplantation, but no guidance is offered regarding agent selection, dosing, or administration. This review presents the current evidence of inhaled nitric oxide in lung or heart transplantation as well as comparisons with other pulmonary vasodilators including cost differences in consideration of economic pressures to contain rising pharmacy costs.

Cost and Factors Associated With the Hospitalization of Patients Undergoing Heart Transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to describe the cost and factors associated with the hospitalization of patients undergoing heart transplantation. METHODS: A cross-sectional, descriptive study with a quantitative approach developed at an important heart transplant center in southern Brazil. Twenty patients who had undergone transplantation during the period 2007 to 2016 were included in the study. Central tendency measures and values presented as mean ± SD or median and quartiles were calculated. Multiple linear regression was performed to verify the variables that interfered with the cost. RESULTS: The cost of hospitalization of patients undergoing heart transplantation was $522,997.26 in Brazilian reals ($220,002.58 in US dollars). The Brazilian public health system was responsible for paying the hospital bill of all patients. Female sex, patients up to 40 years of age, and length of stay in the hospital units were variables that were related to the highest values for the hospital service. Clinical complications of the patients during the hospitalization period were also factors that were related to the greater length of stay in the hospitalization units, reflecting higher expenses for the health institution. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for health managers to implement strategies that will minimize complications, such as health care-related infections, that can be prevented during hospitalization and to stimulate the allocation of resources in order to improve care and reduce hospital expenses.

Stakeholder perspectives of the clinical utility of pharmacogenomic testing in solid organ transplantation.

Aims: To assess stakeholder perspectives regarding the clinical utility of pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing following kidney, liver, and heart transplantation. Methods: We conducted individual semi-structured interviews and focus groups with kidney, liver, and heart transplantation patients and providers. We analyzed the qualitative data to identify salient themes. Results: The study enrolled 36 patients and 24 providers. Patients lacked an understanding about PGx, but expressed interest in PGx testing. Providers expressed willingness to use PGx testing, but reported barriers to implementation, such as lack of knowledge, lack of evidence demonstrating clinical utility, and patient healthcare burden. Conclusion: Patient and provider educational efforts, including foundational knowledge, clinical evidence, and applications to patient care beyond just immunosuppression, may be useful to facilitate the use of PGx testing in transplant medicine.

Precision QALYs, Precisely Unjust.

Warwick Heale has recently defended the notion of individualized and personalized Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in connection with health care resource allocation decisions. Ordinarily, QALYs are used to make allocation decisions at the population level. If a health care intervention costs £100,000 and generally yields only two years of survival, the cost per QALY gained will be £50,000, far in excess of the £30,000 limit per QALY judged an acceptable use of resources within the National Health Service in the United Kingdom. However, if we know with medical certainty that a patient will gain four extra years of life from that intervention, the cost per QALY will be £25,000. Heale argues fairness and social utility require such a patient to receive that treatment, even though all others in the cohort of that patient might be denied that treatment (and lose two years of potential life). Likewise, Heale argues that personal commitments of an individual (religious or otherwise), that determine how they value a life-year with some medical intervention, ought to be used to determine the value of a QALY for them. I argue that if Heale's proposals were put into practice, the result would often be greater injustice. In brief, requirements for the just allocation of health care resources are more complex than pure cost-effectiveness analysis would allow.

Elective or emergency heart transplantation: Cost comparison in a single center.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Heart transplantation (HT) is the treatment of choice for selected cases of advanced heart failure. There is an increasing rate of emergency HT in our country. The aim of this study was to determine the cost of HT in our hospital according to emergent vs. elective transplantation status. METHODS: The costs of all consecutive HTs performed in our center between January 2010 and May 2015 were analyzed. The cost of elective and emergent HT was compared. RESULTS: HT mean cost at our institution was €62 203 ± 47 976. Elective HT mean cost was €47 540 ± 25 140, whereas emergent HT cost was €102 733 ± 68 050 (emergency status 1, as regional priority, was €66 077 ± 28 067 and emergency status 0, as the highest national priority, was €136 056 ± 77 080; P < 0.001). Increased emergent HT cost was mainly related to a longer admission (32 ± 24 days vs. 69 ± 53 days; P = 0.006; accounting for a cost of €14 517 ± 12 475 vs. €37 846 ± 31 702; P < 0.001) and increased drug-related expenses (€6622 ± 7465 vs. €15,171 ± 15,758; P < 0.02). Elective HT survival rate was 96%, compared to 68% for emergent HT; P = 0.002. CONCLUSIONS: Elective HT showed a high survival rate with a relatively low and less variable cost, leading to a favorable economic balance in today's public health reimbursement system. In contrast, emergent HT showed a higher cost and a lower survival rate. New treatment strategies should be identified for heart failure patients at risk of requiring emergency HT.

Increased mortality, morbidities, and costs after heart transplantation in heterotaxy syndrome and other complex situs arrangements.

OBJECTIVES: Identify pediatric heart transplant (HT) recipients with heterotaxy and other complex arrangements of cardiac situs (heterotaxy/situs anomaly) and compare mortality, morbidities, length of stay (LOS), and costs to recipients with congenital heart disease without heterotaxy/situs anomaly. METHODS: Using linked registry data (2001-2016), we identified 186 HT recipients with heterotaxy/situs anomaly and 1254 with congenital heart disease without heterotaxy/situs anomaly. We compared post-HT outcomes in univariable and multivariable time-to-event analyses. LOS and cost from HT to discharge were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Sensitivity analyses were performed using stricter heterotaxy/situs anomaly group inclusion criteria and through propensity matching. RESULTS: HT recipients with heterotaxy/situs anomaly were older (median age, 5.1 vs 1.6 years; P < .001) and more often black, Asian, Hispanic, or "other" nonwhite (54% vs 32%; P < .001). Heterotaxy/situs anomaly was independently associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.09; P = .002), even among 6-month survivors (hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.16; P = .021). Heterotaxy/situs anomaly recipients more commonly required dialysis (odds ratio, 2.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-4.42; P = .001) and cardiac reoperation (odds ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-3.11; P = .010) before discharge. They had longer ischemic times (19.2 additional minutes [range, 10.9-27.5 minutes]; P < .001), post-HT intensive care unit LOS (16 vs 13 days; P = .012), and hospital LOS (26 vs 23 days; P = .005). Post-HT hospitalization costs were also greater ($447,604 vs $379,357; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Heterotaxy and other complex arrangements of cardiac situs are associated with increased mortality, postoperative complications, LOS, and costs after HT. Although increased surgical complexity can account for many of these differences, inferior late survival is not well explained and deserves further study.

Recipient working status is independently associated with outcomes in heart and lung transplantation.

Employment status may capture elements of patients' physical strength, mental resilience, and socioeconomic status to better prognosticate transplant outcomes. This study characterized the effect of working status on thoracic transplant outcomes by evaluating the United Network for Organ Sharing registry for adult lung or heart transplants from 2005 to 2016. Kaplan-Meier estimates illustrated 5-year and 10-year survival by working status at transplant, while multivariable Cox proportional hazards regressions controlled for baseline differences, including functional and socioeconomic status. Of 17 778 lung transplant recipients, 1700 (9.6%) worked at transplant and experienced significantly lower 5-year mortality than nonworking recipients (38.6% vs 45.5%, P < 0.001). Of 21 394 heart transplant recipients, 1289 (6.0%) were employed and experienced significantly lower 10-year mortality than nonworking recipients (34.1% vs 40.2%, P < 0.001). Adjusted Cox regressions demonstrated that employment significantly reduced mortality independent of functional status for both lung (HR: 0.86 [0.78-0.95], P = 0.003) and heart (HR: 0.84 [0.72-0.97], P = 0.023) recipients. After accounting for insurance status, the effect of working status persisted only in lung transplantation (HR: 0.89 [0.81-0.98], P = 0.023). Since heart and lung transplant candidates employed at transplant face lower long-term mortality, working status must encompass a broad set of physical, psychological, and socioeconomic variables that may prognosticate post-transplant outcomes.

Emerging Trends in Financing of Adult Heart Transplantation in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined longitudinal trends in types of payers for adult heart transplantations in the United States. BACKGROUND: In the last decade, volume of heart transplantations in the United States has substantially increased, a trend that has coincided with Medicaid expansion and greater insurance coverage in the general U.S. POPULATION: Limited data are available characterizing the changes in payer mix supporting these recent increases in heart transplantation activity. METHODS: De-identified data were obtained from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network for heart transplantation recipients 18 to 64 years of age in the United States between 1997 and 2017. Primary sources of insurance payment were determined at the time of transplantation in aggregate and stratified by sex and race. Changes in volume and payer mix of patients added to the candidate waitlist between 1997 and 2017 were also examined. RESULTS: A total of 36,340 adults from 18 to 64 years of age underwent heart transplantations between 1997 and 2017. Support by public payer insurance increased from 28.2% (in 1997) to a peak of 48.8% (in 2016). Medicaid coverage increased from 9.4% in 1997 to 15.5% in 2007 and remained stable to 2017 (14.7%; ß-coefficient: +0.23% [0.04]; p < 0.001 for trend). Medicare beneficiaries accounted for 18.2% of recipients in 1997, 22% in 2007, and 30.3% in 2016 (ß-coefficient: +0.60% [0.06]; p < 0.001 for trend). The proportion of transplantation candidates receiving Medicare coverage increased over time across all races and both sexes. Similar aggregate patterns were observed in waitlist trends for adult heart transplantation candidates. CONCLUSIONS: Public payer insurance has emerged as an increasingly dominant source of funding for adult heart transplantations in the United States, supporting nearly half of all transplants in 2017.

Mortality, Resource Utilization, and Inpatient Costs Vary Among Pediatric Heart Transplant Indications: A Merged Data Set Analysis From the United Network for Organ Sharing and Pediatric Health Information Systems Databases.

BACKGROUND: Merging United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and Pediatric Health Information Systems databases has enabled a more granular analysis of pediatric heart transplant outcomes and resource utilization. We evaluated whether transplant indication at time of transplantation was associated with mortality, resource utilization, and inpatient costs during the first year after transplantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed transplant outcomes and resource utilization from 2004 to 2015. Patients were categorized as congenital (CHD), myocarditis, or cardiomyopathy based on UNOS-defined primary indication. CHD complexity subgroup analyses (single-ventricle, complex, and simple biventricular CHD) were also performed. Of 2251 transplants (49% CHD, 5% myocarditis, 46% cardiomyopathy), CHD recipients were younger (2 [IQR 0-10], 6 [IQR 0-12], and 7 [IQR 1-14] years, respectively; P < .001) and less likely to have a ventricular assist device (VAD) at transplantation (3%, 27%, and 13%, respectively; P < .001). Patients with single-ventricle CHD had the longest time on the waitlist and were least likely to receive a VAD before transplantation. After adjusting for patient-level factors, transplant recipients with single-ventricle CHD had the greatest mortality during transplantation admission and within 1 year (odds ratio [OR] 11.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.9-23.6] and OR 6.0 [95% CI 3.6-10.2], respectively, vs cardiomyopathy). Mortality was similar between patients with myocarditis and cardiomyopathy. Post-transplantation length of stay (LOS) was longer in transplant recipients with CHD than myocarditis or cardiomyopathy (25 [interquartile range [IQR] 15-45] vs 21 [IQR 12-35] vs 16 [IQR 12-25] days; P < .001), related in part to longer duration of intensive care unit-level care (ICU LOS 8 [IQR 4-20] vs 6 [IQR 4-13] vs 5 [IQR 3-8] days; P < .001). Similarly, patients with CHD had higher median post-transplantation costs than myocarditis or cardiomyopathy ($415K [IQR $201K-503K] vs $354K [IQR $179K-390K] vs $284K [IQR $145K-319K]; P < .001) that persisted after adjusting for patient-level factors (adjusted cost ratio 1.4 [95% CI 1.4-1.5], CHD vs cardiomyopathy) and was primarily driven by longer LOS. More than 50% were readmitted during the first year after transplantation, although readmission rates were similar across transplant indications (P = .42). CONCLUSIONS: Children with CHD, particularly single-ventricle patients, require substantially greater hospital resource utilization and have significantly worse outcomes during the first year after heart transplantation compared with other indications. Further work is aimed at identifying modifiable pre-transplantation risk factors, such as pre-transplantation conditioning with VAD support and cardiac rehabilitation, to improve post-transplantation outcomes and reduce resource utilization in this complex population.

Center Variation in Hospital Costs for Pediatric Heart Transplantation: The Relationship Between Cost and Outcomes.

There are limited published data addressing the costs associated with pediatric heart transplantation and no studies evaluating the variation in costs across centers. We aimed to describe center variation in pediatric heart transplant costs and assess the association of transplant hospitalization costs with patient outcomes. Using a linkage between the Pediatric Health Information System and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients databases, hospital costs were assessed for patients (< 18 years of age) undergoing heart transplantation (2007-2016). Severity-adjusted patient costs were calculated using generalized linear mixed-effects models with a random hospital intercept. Center variation in hospital cost was described after adjusting for the predicted risk of in-hospital mortality. Post-transplant survival was compared between low- and high-cost centers using Cox proportional hazard models. A total of 2156 patients were included from 24 centers. There was 3.7-fold variation in transplant hospitalization costs across centers, ranging from $329,477 to $1,226,507. Patients transplanted at high-cost centers have a higher predicted risk of in-hospital mortality (8.1% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.001). Both early (p = 0.008) and long-term (p = 0.003) post-transplant survival were better in patients transplanted at low-cost centers. Transplant at low-cost centers was associated with improved post-transplant survival, independent of patient-specific risk (adjusted hazard ratio 0.72; 95%CI 0.57-0.92, p = 0.008). There is wide variation in cost for pediatric heart transplant inpatient care among U.S. centers with low-cost centers demonstrating the best patient survival. Differences in patient populations likely contribute to these findings, but cannot account for all the variation seen. This suggests that variability in the delivery of care across centers may influence post-transplant survival.

Heart Transplantation Cost Composition in Brazil: A Patient-Level Microcosting Analysis and Comparison With International Data.

BACKGROUND: Advanced heart failure (HF) therapies, such as heart transplantation, are resource intensive and costly. In Brazil, only one-fifth of the estimated population need is fulfilled. We examined cost expenditures of heart transplants in a public institution in Brazil. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used microcosting analysis (time-driven activity-based costing) to examine total costs and individual cost components related to the index transplant hospital admission of all consecutive heart transplant recipients at a single center from July 2015 to June 2017. Average total cost for the 27 patients included was US$ 74,341 which exceeds the reimbursement value per patient by 60%. Major cost drivers were hospital structure and personnel, similarly to what is observed in the United States (US) and other developed countries. Total costs for index transplant admission were ∼50% lower than in the US, but approximate to values reported in some European countries. Costs of heart transplantation in Brazil were lower than those reported for developed countries, and higher than national reimbursement values. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced microcosting methodologies represent an important quality contribution to economic studies in health care and may provide insights for transplant-related health care policies in developing countries.

Impact of insurance type on eligibility for advanced heart failure therapies and survival.

BACKGROUND: Medicaid insurance in Georgia provides limited reimbursement for heart transplant (HT) and left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). We examined whether insurance type affects eligibility for and survival after receipt of HT or LVAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively identified patients evaluated for HT/LVAD from 2012 to 2016. We used multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression to examine the association of insurance type on treatment eligibility and 1-year survival. Of 569 patients evaluated, 282 (49.6%) had private, 222 (39.0%) had Medicare, and 65 (11.4%) had Medicaid insurance. Patients with Medicaid were younger, more likely to be Black, with fewer medical comorbidities. In adjusted models, Medicare and Medicaid insurance predicted lower odds of eligibility for HT, but did not affect survival after HT. Among those ineligible for HT, Medicaid patients were less likely to receive destination therapy (DT) LVAD (adj OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.66; P = .02) and had increased risk of death (adj HR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.13-3.63; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite younger age and fewer comorbidities, patients with Medicaid insurance are less likely to receive DT LVAD and have an increased risk of death once deemed ineligible for HT. Medicaid patients in Georgia need improved access to DT LVAD.

Readmission and resource utilization after orthotopic heart transplant versus ventricular assist device in the National Readmissions Database, 2010-2014.

BACKGROUND: As the technology of ventricular assist devices continues to improve, the morbidity and mortality for patients with a ventricular assist device is expected to approach that of orthotopic heart transplantation. The present study was performed to compare perioperative outcomes, readmission, and resource utilization between ventricular assist device implantation and orthotopic heart transplantation, using a national cohort. METHODS: Patients who underwent either orthotopic heart transplantation or ventricular assist device implantation from 2010 to 2014 in the National Readmission Database were selected. RESULTS: Of the 12,111 patients identified during the study period, 5,440 (45%) received orthotopic heart transplantation, while 6,671 (55%) received ventricular assist devices. Readmissions occurred frequently after ventricular assist device implantation and orthotopic heart transplantation, with greater rates at 30 days (29% versus 24%, P=.005) and 6 months (62% versus 46%, P < .001) for the ventricular assist device cohort. Cost of readmission was greater among ventricular assist device patients at 30 days ($29,115 versus $21,586, P=.0002) and 6 months ($34,878 versus $20,144, P = .0106). CONCLUSION: Readmission rates and costs for patients with a ventricular assist device remain greater than their orthotopic heart transplantation counterparts. Given the projected increases in ventricular assist device utilization and limited transplant donor pool, further emphasis on cost containment and decreased readmissions for patients undergoing a ventricular assist device is essential to the viability of such therapy in the era of value-based health care delivery.

Trends and Cost of Heart Transplantation and Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Impact of Proposed Federal Cuts.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare trends of use, in-hospital mortality, and annual expenditures associated with orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. In view of the changing health care landscape, we assessed the impact of federal funding cuts on Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries seeking these procedures. BACKGROUND: Use and cost trends associated with OHT and LVAD are not well defined. Moreover, little is known about the economic contribution of Medicare and Medicaid for these procedures. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2009 through 2014, the study identified index hospitalizations for OHT and LVAD. The aforementioned trends and inflation-adjusted cost analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 28,765 hospitalizations associated with OHT or LVAD were identified. The number of index hospitalizations for OHT increased from 1,795 to 2,140, whereas the number of LVAD implants increased from 2,205 to 3,645 (ptrend <0.001 for both). Unadjusted in-hospital mortality declined significantly from 17% to 12% (ptrend = 0.013) but remained unchanged for OHT (4.5% and 6.6%, respectively; ptrend = 0.30). The annual expenditure increased from ∼$288 to $451 million for OHT and from ∼$400 to $800 million for LVAD during the study period. Overall, Medicare and Medicaid contributed to more than 50% of the costs associated with these hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: With increasing use and annual expenditure, OHT and LVAD account for more than 1 billion dollars of the health care budget. In-hospital mortality associated with LVAD has continued to decline but has remained higher than that with OHT. Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries seeking these procedures would be adversely affected by the proposed cuts.

Socioeconomic Disparities in Adherence and Outcomes After Heart Transplant: A UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing) Registry Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is mixed evidence of racial and socioeconomic disparities in heart transplant outcomes. Their underlying cause-and whether individual- or community-level traits are most influential-remains unclear. The current study aimed to characterize socioeconomic disparities in outcomes and identify time trends and mediators of these disparities. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used United Network for Organ Sharing registry data and included 33 893 adult heart transplant recipients between 1994 and 2014. Socioeconomic status (SES) indicators included insurance, education, and neighborhood SES measured using a composite index. Black race and multiple indicators of low SES were associated with the primary outcome of death or retransplant, independent of baseline clinical characteristics. Blacks had lower HLA and race matching, but further adjustment for these and other graft characteristics only slightly attenuated the association with black race (HR, 1.25 after adjustment). This and the associations with neighborhood SES (HR, 1.19 for lowest versus highest decile), Medicare (HR, 1.17), Medicaid (HR, 1.29), and college education (HR, 0.90) remained significant after full adjustment. When comparing early (1994-2000) and late (2001-2014) cohorts, the disparities associated with the middle (second and third) quartiles significantly decreased over time, but those associated with lowest SES quartile and black race persisted. Low neighborhood SES was also associated with higher risks of noncompliance (HR, 1.76), rejection (HR, 1.28), hospitalization (HR, 1.13), and infection (HR, 1.10). CONCLUSIONS: Racial and socioeconomic disparities exist in heart transplant outcomes, but the latter may be narrowing over time. These disparities are not explained by differences in clinical or graft characteristics.

Changes in Pediatric Heart Transplant Hospitalization Costs Over Time.

BACKGROUND: Despite significant changes in the past decade for children undergoing heart transplantation, including the evolution of mechanical circulatory support and increasing patient complexity, costs and resource utilization have not been reassessed. We sought to use a novel linkage of clinical-registry and administrative data to examine changes in hospitalization costs over time in this population. METHODS: We identified all pediatric heart transplant recipients in a unique linked Pediatric Health Information System/Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data set (2002-2016). Hospital costs were estimated from charges using cost-to-charge ratios, inflated to 2016 dollars. Severity-adjusted costs were calculated using generalized linear mixed-effects models. Costs were compared across 3 eras (era 1, 2002-2006; era 2, 2007-2011; and era 3, 2012-2016). RESULTS: A total of 2896 pediatric heart transplant recipients were included: era 1, 649 (22.4%); era 2, 1028 (35.5%); and era 3, 1219 (42.1%). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support at transplant decreased over time, concurrent with an increase in ventricular assist device-supported patients. Between era 1 and era 2, there was an increase in pretransplant hospitalization costs (US $343 692 vs US $435 554; P < 0.001). However, between era 2 and era 3, there was a decline in total (US $906 454 vs US $767 221; P < 0.001), pretransplant (US $435 554 vs US $353 364; P < 0.001), and posttransplant (US $586 133 vs US $508 719; P = 0.002) hospitalization costs. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent with the increase in utilization of ventricular assist device support, there has been an increase in pretransplant costs associated with pediatric heart transplantation. However, in the most recent era, costs have declined. These findings suggest the evolution of more cost-effective management strategies, which may be related to shifts in the approach to pediatric mechanical circulatory support.